Current advances in understanding the Grapevine Pinot gris virus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51258/RJH.2022.02Keywords:
Vitis, GPGV, GFkV, ELISA, virus distribution, stomata, leaf temperatureAbstract
Grapevine virus diseases are widely spread in all viticultural areas of the world and they are considered detrimental, their presence is the most limiting factor of plants performances and vineyard life lasting. A large number of viruses have been identified in grapevine. From them, reported for the first time in 2012, Grapevine Pinot gris virus (GPGV) is spread all over the world. This study brings new knowledge about the virus distribution in plants throughout one year, the organ and period of sampling, for a reliable diagnostic. Additionally, the influence of high temperature on the physiological processes was investigated. Plants belonging to the 'Negru mare' genotype, natural infected with GPGV and Grapevine fleck virus (GFkV), maintained in a greenhouse, constituted the biological material. ELISA analyses of different grapevine organs and tissues (apex, leaf blade, petiole, young shoot, tendril, inflorescence, cane) located along the length of the shoot, carried out on different phenophases (before flowering, after flowering, veraison, dormancy) revealed that the conductive tissue was the most appropriate for diagnosis in the active growth period when the air temperature did not exceed 30°C. The measurement of the leaf temperature in two moments of the day (morning and afternoon), when the air temperature records increasing values revealed that at high temperatures (above 37°C), as a result of the intensification of the transpiration processes, the temperature at the leaf level does not increase progressively with the air temperature. Measurements of stomatal opening in two periods of the day in infected and virus-free grapevines showed that GPGV+GFkV complex infection caused sometimes a significant increase in stomatal opening both in the morning and in the afternoon, which could be a deficiency in the management of water and gas exchanges in plants.
Downloads
References
Allègre M., Daire X., Héloir M.-C., Trouvelot S., Mercier, L., Adrian M. and Pugin A. (2007). Stomatal deregulation in Plasmopara viticola –infected grapevine leaves. New Phytol., 173: 832-840
Bertamini M., Muthuchelian K. and Nedunchezhian N. (2004). Effect of grapevine leafroll on the photosynthesis of field grown grapevine plants (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Lagrein). J. Phytopatol., 152(3): 145–152.
Bovey R., Bruger J.J. & Gugerli P. (1980). Detection of fanleaf virus in grapevine tissue extracts by enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immune electron microscopy (IEM). Proceedings of the 7th Meeting of ICVG, Niagara Falls,Canada, September 8-12, 1980, pp. 259-275.
Buciumeanu E.-C., Guţă I.-C. and Vişoiu E. (2008). Improvement of grapevine virus A (GVA) diagnosis by ELISA testing. Analele Universităţii din Craiova vol. XIII (XLIX). Seria Biologie, Horticultură, Tehnologia Prelucrării Produselor Agricole, Ingineria mediului, Craiova: Editura Universitaria, pp. 105–110.
Clark M.F. and Adams, A.N. (1977). Characteristics of the microplate method of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of plant viruses. J. Gen. Virol., 34(3): 475-483.
de Sousa, E. (1997). Efficiency of diagnosis of grapevine leafroll virus (GLRaV3). Extended abstracts of the 12th Meeting of ICVG, Lisbon, Portugal, September 28 - October 2, 1997, pp. 106.
Endeshaw, S.T., Sabbatini, P., Romanazzi, G., Schilder, A.C. and Neri D. (2014). Effects of grapevine leafroll associated virus 3 infection on growth, leaf gas exchange, yield and basic fruit chemistry of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Franc. Sci. Hortic., 170: 228–236.
Fiore N., Prodan S. and Pino A.M. (2009). Monitoring grapevine viruses by ELISA and RT-PCR throughout the year. J. Plant Pathol., 91(2): 489-493.
Fuchs M. (2020). Grapevine viruses: a multitude of diverse species with simple but overall poorly adopted management solutions in the vineyard. J. Plant Pathol. 102: 643-653.
Giribaldi M., Purrotti M., Pacifico D., Santini D., Mannini F., Caciagli P., Rolle L., Cavallarin L., Giuffrida M.G. and Marzachì C. (2011). A multidisciplinary study on the effects of phloem-limited viruses on the agronomical performance and berry quality of Vitis vinifera cv. Nebbiolo. J. Proteomics, 75(1): 306-315.
Gokbayrak Z., Dardeniz A. and Bal M. (2008). Stomatal density adaptation of grapevine to windly conditions. TJS, 6(1): 18-22.
Golino D.A., Sim S. and Rowhani A. (2003). The role or rootstock genotype in the effects of single and mixed infections of grapevine viruses. Extended abstracts of the 14th Meeting of ICVG, Locorotondo (Bari), Italy, September 12-17, 2003, pp. 246-247.
González E., Mosquera M.V., San José, M.C. and Diaz, T. (1997). Influence of Virus on the Chlorophyll, Carotenoid and Polyamine Contents in Grapevine Microcuttings. J. Phytopathol., 145(4):185–187.
Guță I.-C. and Buciumeanu E.-C. (2011). Fanleaf virus distribution and its relationship with physiological process of photosynthesis in grapevine rootstock cv. St. George. Analele Universitații din Craiova, Seria Biologie, Horticultură. Tehnologia Prelucrării Produselor Agricole, Ingineria mediului Vol XVI (LII), Craiova: Editura Universitaria, pp. 203-208.
Kappagantu M., Collum T.D., Dardick C. and Culver J.N. (2020). Viral Hacks of the Plant Vasculature: The Role of Phloem Alterations in Systemic Virus Infection. Ann. Rev. Virol., 7(1): 351-370.
Mannini F. (2003). Virus elimination in grapevine and crop performances. Extended abstracts of the 14th Meeting of ICVG, Locorotondo (Bari), Italy, September 12-17, 2003, pp. 234-239.
Mannini F. and Digiaro M. (2017). The Effects of Viruses and Viral Diseases on Grapes and Wine. In: Meng, B., Martelli, G., Golino, D. and Fuchs, M. (eds) Grapevine Viruses: Molecular Biology, Diagnostics and Management, Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57706-7_23, pp. 453-482.
Martelli G.P. and Boudon-Padieu E. (Eds.) (2006). Options méditerranéenes. Serie B: Studies and Research 55, Bari, CIHEAM (Centre International de Hautes Etudes Agronomique Méditerranéen), Italy/ISSN-1016-1228.
Martínez-Lüscher, J., Plank C.M., Brillante L., Cooper M.L., Smith R.J., Al-Rwahnih M., Yu R., Oberholster A., Girardello R. and Kurtural S.K. (2019). Grapevine Red Blotch Virus May Reduce Carbon Translocation Leading to Impaired Grape Berry Ripening. J. Agric. Food Chem., 67 (9): 2437–2448.
Melotto M., Underwood W., Koczan J., Nomura K. and He S.Y. (2006). Plant stomata function in innate immunity against bacterial invasion. Cell, 126: 969–980.
Monis J. and Bestwick R. K. (1996). Detection and Localization of Grapevine Leafroll Associated Closteroviruses in Greenhouse and Tissue Culture Grown Plants. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 47(2): 199-205.
Murray R., Emblow M., Hetherington A. and Foster G.D. (2016). Plant virus infections control stomatal development. Sci. Rep., 6: 34507.
Perrone I., Chitarra W., Boccacci P. and Gambino G. (2017). Grapevine–virus–environment interactions: An intriguing puzzle to solve. New Phytol., 213: 983–987.
Pesqueira A.M., García-Berrios J.-J., Barrasa M. and Cabaleiro C. (2012). Economic Impact of Leafroll Disease in Vineyards of the Cultivar Albariño in Rías Baixas (Spain), Proceedings of the 17th Congress of ICVG, Davis, CA, USA, October 7-14, 2012, pp. 57–58.
Saldarelli P., Gualandri V., Malossini U. and Glasa M. (2017). Grapevine Pinot gris virus. In: Meng, B., Martelli, G.P., Golino, D.A., Fuchs, M. (eds), Grapevine viruses: molecular biology, diagnostics and management. Springer International Publishing, pp. 351–363.
Suzuki N., Rivero R.M., Shulaev V., Blumwald E. and Mittler R. (2014). Abiotic and biotics tress combinations. New Phytol., 203: 32–43.
Walter B. and Etienne, L. (1987). Detection of the Grapevine Fanleaf Viruses Away from the Period of Vegetation. J. Phytopathol., 12(4): 355–364.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
