Fruit quality assessment of some Romanian pear cultivars

Authors

  • E. Mareși Research Institute for Fruit Growing Pitesti, Romania Author
  • M. Militaru Research Institute for Fruit Growing Pitesti, Romania Author
  • M. Butac Research Institute for Fruit Growing Pitesti, Romania Author
  • A. Stan Research Institute for Fruit Growing Pitesti, Romania Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51258/RJH.2022.17

Keywords:

Pyrus, size, firmness, lightness, soluble solids content, acidity.

Abstract

Similar to apple, pear is one of the most important horticultural crops with high nutritional and economical value. The biological and economic traits of the specie, as well as the fruits quality, make the pear growing much appreciated and to be given an increasing importance. Five pear cultivars ('Paramis', 'Paradox', 'Paradise', 'Isadora', 'Pandora') registered in the last period by Research Institute for Fruit Growing Pitesti, Romania and one selection 'SP06C2P5' ('Packham’s Triumph' x 'Monica') were investigated regarding their physical-chemical parameters. Fruits quality attributes were determined by the external (weight, size, skin lightness) and internal (firmness, total soluble solids, acidity, pH). Observations and determinations were made in the season of 2019, 2020 and 2021, in field trial planted in 2016. For this study, comparisons were made with 'Monica', the most spread bred Romanian cultivar. Significant differences were encountered among the different cultivars for most of the quantitative characters, such as fruit weight, caliber, lightness, total soluble solids (TSS) and acidity. Based on these results, ‘Pandora’ cv. had the highest annual average of weight (243.17g), ‘Isadora’ cv. the highest amount of TSS (14.63%), ‘SP06C2P5’ the highest amount of malic (0.74%), citric (0.71%) and tartric acid (0.80%). The data referring to the external and internal fruit quality traits of new bred Romanian pear cultivars are useful for growers, but also to enrich germplasm collection and to select proper parents for breeding. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brewer L., Morgan C., Volz R.K., Weskett R. and White A.G. (2006). 'Convenience'-the focus of the new age pear. 13th Australasian Plant Breeding Conference, Christchurch, New Zealand: 155-160.

Brewer L., Morgan C., Alspach P.A., Volz R.K. and White A.G. (2008). Interspecific pear breeding for flavor and texture. Acta Hortic. 800: 461-468.

Branişte N., Budan S., Butac M. and Militaru M. (2013). Recently achievements in fruit breeding at the Research Institute for Fruit Growing Pitesti, Romania. Lucrări științifice: Horticultură, Viticultură şi Vinificaţie, Silvicultură şi Grădini publice, Protecţia plantelor, vol. 36: 9-13.

Budan S., Branişte N., Butac M., Militaru M. and Glăman Gh. (2010). Some recent achievements in fruit breeding in Romania. In XXVIII International Horticultural Congress on Science and Horticulture for People (IHC2010): International Symposium on New Deevelopments in Plant Genetics and Breeding. Acta Hortic. 935: 153-160.

Budan S., Butac M. and Militaru M. (2012). New breeding releases from the Research Institute for Fruit Growing, Pitesti. AgroLife Scientific Journal, vol. 1: 93-96.

Butac M. and Militaru M. (2017). Quality of some Romanian cultivars in correlation with consumer preferences. Fruit Growing Research, 33: 11-17.

Eccher Zerbini P. (2002). The quality of pear fruit. Acta Hortic. 596: 805-810.

Iglesias I. (2008). Agronomical performance and fruit quality of early harvesting pear cultivars in Spain. Acta Hortic. 800: 249-261.

Jiaming Li, Zhang M., Li X., Khan A., Kumar S., Charles Allan A., Lin-Wang K., Espley R. V., Wang Ca., Wang R., et. al., (2022). Pear genetics: Recent advances, new prospects, and a roadmap for the future. Horticulture Research, volume 9: 1-19.

Militaru M., Braniște N., Sestraș A. and Andrieș N. (2010). Ameliorarea soiurilor de pere. Realizări și perspective. Ed. Universității din Pitești: 22-23 (in Romanian).

Militaru M., Braniște N., Sestraș A., Andreieș N., Butac M. and Stanciu C. (2010). Contributions to the improvement of the Romanian pear varieties in the past 10 years. Lucrări Științifice, Universitatea de Științe Agricole Și Medicină Veterinară "Ion Ionescu de la Brad" Iași, Seria Horticultură, 53(1): 341-346.

Militaru M., Braniste N., Butac M., Sestras A., Sotiropoulos T., Luki, M. and Dzhuvinov V. (2013). Review of pome fruit breeding in Balkan. Acta Hortic. 981: 177-184.

Predieri S. and Gatti E. (2008). Consumer evaluation of ‘Abate Fetel' pears. Acta Hortic. 800: 999-1004.

***, 2022. FAO Stat Data Base.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-15

How to Cite

(1)
E. Mareși; M. Militaru; M. Butac; A. Stan. Fruit Quality Assessment of Some Romanian Pear Cultivars. RJH 2022, 3, 147-154. https://doi.org/10.51258/RJH.2022.17.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 36

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.