Growth and yield performance of Cucumber (Cucumis sativus) under different intercropping patterns with Water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51258/RJH.2025.08Keywords:
cucumber, water spinach, intercropping pattern, crop productivity, resource efficiency, agroecological managementAbstract
Intercropping has emerged as a sustainable agronomic strategy to enhance land-use efficiency and crop productivity through improved resource utilization and ecological balance. This study investigated the growth and yield performance of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) under different intercropping patterns with water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica). A field experiment was conducted using a randomized complete block design (RCBD) consisting of four treatments—monoculture, single-row intercropping, double-row intercropping, and alternating single-row intercropping—with three replications. Growth parameters (plant height and leaf number) and yield components (fruit length, diameter, weight, and number per plant) were measured. Results showed that intercropping patterns had a significant impact on cucumber growth and yield. The double-row intercropping system produced the highest plant height, number of leaves, and yield per hectare, statistically comparable to monoculture but superior to single-row and alternating patterns. Enhanced performance under the double-row system was attributed to improved light distribution, nutrient uptake, and soil moisture retention, which reduced interspecific competition and promoted photosynthetic efficiency. Conversely, single-row intercropping resulted in lower yield due to higher competition for resources. These findings suggest that the double-row intercropping pattern offers an ecologically efficient and productive alternative to monoculture, contributing to sustainable vegetable production systems. Implementing row-based intercropping could optimize land productivity while supporting agroecological resilience and resource-use efficiency in intensive vegetable cultivation.
Downloads
References
Andersen, M.K., 2005. Competition and complementarity in annual intercrops - the role of plant available nutrients, in: The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark, Department of Soil Science. p. 123.
Chadfield, V., Hartley, S., Redeker, K., 2022. Associational resistance through intercropping reduces yield losses to soil‐borne pests and diseases. The New Phytologist. 235: 2393–2405.
Chaudhary, M., Kumar, R., Yadav, A., Maurya, S.K., Sahu, S., Tiwari, A., 2022. Best Row Ratio Combinations of Agronomic Crops in the Intercropping System: An Overview. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science. 34(22): 645–654.
Chen, P., Song, C., Liu, X.-M., Zhou, L., Yang, H., Zhang, X., Zhou, Y., Du, Q., Pang, T., Fu, Z.-D., Wang, X.-C., Liu, W., Yang, F., Shu, K., Du, J., Liu, J., Yang, W., Yong, T., 2019. Yield advantage and nitrogen fate in an additive maize-soybean relay intercropping system. The Science of the total environment. 657: 987–999.
Feng, L., Raza, M., Chen, Y., Khalid, M., Meraj, T., Ahsan, F., Fan, Y., Du, J., Wu, X., Song, C., Liu, C., Bawa, G., Zhang, Z., Yuan, S., Yang, F., Yang, W., 2019. Narrow-wide row planting pattern improves the light environment and seed yields of intercrop species in relay intercropping system. PLoS ONE. 14(2): e0212885.
Frąc, M., Panek, J., Gryta, A., Oszust, K., Pertile, G., Siegieda, D., Mącik, M., Pylak, M., Imran Pathan, S., Pietramellara, G., 2023. Legume-cereal intercropping as a strategy of regenerative agriculture supporting reverse of biodiversity loss - relevance of microbiome-based research. ARPHA Conference Abstracts. 6: e108886.
Fu, Z.-D., Zhou, L., Chen, P., Du, Q., Pang, T., Song, C., Wang, X., Liu, W., Yang, W., Yong, T., 2019. Effects of maize-soybean relay intercropping on crop nutrient uptake and soil bacterial community. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 18(9): 2006–2018.
Glaze-Corcoran, S., Hashemi, M., Sadeghpour, A., Jahanzad, E., Keshavarz Afshar, R., Liu, X., Herbert, S.J., 2020. Understanding intercropping to improve agricultural resiliency and environmental sustainability. Advances in Agronomy. 162: 199–256.
Gou, F., Ittersum, M., Simon, E., Leffelaar, P., Putten, P., Zhang, L., Werf, W., 2017. Intercropping wheat and maize increases total radiation interception and wheat RUE but lowers maize RUE. European Journal of Agronomy. 84: 125–139.
Jianxiong, H., Jian, P., Zhou, L., Dinghua, Z., Yuan, S., Chen, J.-F., Li, J., Qing, G., Lin, W., 2020. An improved double-row rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) plantation system increases land use efficiency by allowing intercropping with yam bean, common bean, soybean, peanut, and coffee: A 17-year case study on Hainan Island, China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 263: 121493.
Kumar, R., Bhushan, A., Samnotra, R., Sharma, S., Naik, R., Chheepa, M.S., Naga, V.K., 2022. Heritability Analysis for Horticultural Traits in Tomato under Low Cost Polyhouse Conditions of Jammu Subtropics. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change. 12(10): 737–741.
Li, C., Stomph, T., Makowski, D., Li, H., Zhang, C., Zhang, F., Van Der Werf, W., 2023. The productive performance of intercropping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 120(2): e2201886120.
Li, X.-F., Wang, Z.-G., Bao, X.-G., Sun, J.-H., Yang, S.-C., Wang, P., Wang, C.-B., Wu, J.-P., Liu, X.-R., Tian, X.-L., Wang, Yu, Li, J.-P., Wang, Yan, Xia, H.-Y., Mei, P.-P., Wang, X.-F., Zhao, J.-H., Yu, R.-P., Zhang, W.-P., Che, Z.-X., Gui, L.-G., Callaway, R., Tilman, D., Li, L., 2021. Long-term increased grain yield and soil fertility from intercropping. Nature Sustainability. Nat Sustai(4): 943–950.
Liu, X., Rahman, T., Song, C., Su, B., Yang, F., Yong, T., Wu, Y., Zhang, C., Yang, W., 2017. Changes in light environment, morphology, growth and yield of soybean in maize-soybean intercropping systems. Field Crops Research. 200: 38–46.
Liu, X., Rahman, T., Song, C., Yang, F., Su, B., Cui, L., Bu, W., Yang, W., 2018. Relationships among light distribution, radiation use efficiency and land equivalent ratio in maize-soybean strip intercropping. Field Crops Research. 224: 91–101.
Lu, J., Dong, Q., Lan, G., He, Z., Zhou, D.-M., Zhang, H., Wang, X.-G., Liu, X., Jiang, C.-J., Zhang, Z., Wan, S., Zhao, X., Yu, H., 2023. Row ratio increasing improved light distribution, photosynthetic characteristics, and yield of peanut in the maize and peanut strip intercropping system. Frontiers in Plant Science. 14(14 Juli).
Maitra, S., Hossain, A., Brestič, M., Skalický, M., Ondrisik, P., Gitari, H., Brahmachari, K., Shankar, T., Bhadra, P., Palai, J.B., Jena, J., Bhattacharya, U., Duvvada, S.K., Lalichetti, S., Sairam, M., 2021. Intercropping—A Low Input Agricultural Strategy for Food and Environmental Security. Agronomy. 11(2): 343.
Nweke, I., 2020. Potentials of Intercropping Systems to Soil - Water - Plant-Atmosphere. Agricultural Science. 2(1): 31–38.
Qiang, B., Fan, Z., Tang, N., Asad, M.S., Timbang, B.C., Ren, X., Chen, X., 2024. Improving the productivity of intercropping through above and below ground separation: A case study on photosynthetic characteristics and root distribution. Industrial Crops and Products. 222: 119506.
Rodriguez, C., Carlsson, G., Englund, J., Flöhr, A., Pelzer, E., Jeuffroy, M., Makowski, D., Jensen, E., 2020. Grain legume-cereal intercropping enhances the use of soil-derived and biologically fixed nitrogen in temperate agroecosystems. A meta-analysis. European Journal of Agronomy. 118: 126077.
Setiawan, A., 2023. SmartstatXL Versi 3.6.5.4 [software].
Stefan, L., Engbersen, N., Schöb, C., 2022. Rapid transgenerational adaptation in response to intercropping reduces competition. eLife. 11(Januari): 40.
Toker, P., Canci, H., Turhan, I., Isci, A., Scherzinger, M., Kordrostami, M., Yol, E., 2024. The advantages of intercropping to improve productivity in food and forage production – a review. Plant Production Science. 27(3): 155–169.
Yuhua, Fu, S., Zhang, X., Zhao, K., Chen, H., 2017. Intercropping improves soil nutrient availability, soil enzyme activity and tea quantity and quality. Applied Soil Ecology. 119: 171–178.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
